with other elements. Yet in and of themselves structural elements are meaningless not because of a “lack of meaning” but rather because of a “surplus of meaning”: they have so many potential denotations and connotations that they would be hopelessly ambiguous without the selecting process performed by the network of relations. As such, structural elements do not correspond to the meaning-centered elements considered in non-structuralist literary studies. In fact, from a structuralist perspective,
Page 6